But I don't know where the URL's are. In this pic you see a semi nude. You will also see we are on the All Activity page. At the bottom of her photo we don't see a view count. Scroll down the page, and the photo below hers is that of a city bus. At the bottom of the picture of the city bus we can see a view count, we didn't have to click on the pic to see the view count. But her pic has no view count.
Which leads us to think no one has viewed her pic. But when you click on her, you will learn that she has over views. So why are you forced to click on some pics to see if they have any views, while with other pics you don't have to click on the picture, the view count is displayed for all to see. We see the city bus. And not only can we see the view count without having to click on it but we can see the number of people who made this picture a favorite.
RidetheOasis : It looks like you only see an image count if there is only one image in the "activity set". If there are multiple images, none of them show a count. I can't tell if this is the case from your screenshots Posted 31 months ago. RidetheOasis : In this pic you see a semi nude. Is that Flickr's display of several photos? Or is the photo itself actually a collage? I haven't seen a collage-style display like that from Flickr, but I rarely go to that page, so I don't know if there's something besides a "photo" that Flickr would display on that page as a collage of several photos.
If there is something else like that album? You keep emphasizing that this photo is "semi-nude". I wouldn't think that would have any impact on display of a view-count like this, but if it does, then that does sound like a possible bug. But the relevant thing in that situation would not be anything that we ourselves see in the photo, but rather the safety-flagging safe, moderate, restricted that the photo owner has applied to it.
Okay, that was confusing. I practice the Hairlover technique of typing half an answer, posting it; then either editing or posting a second answer with the complete info. Yes, it is confusing. Apart from getting a comment, as mentioned above: You can gather more info about your visitors viewers , but it's not "built into" flickr. As flickr stats are very rudimentary and do not provide the viewer's IP and other visitor data, e.
Some folks do use the "Flag counter", but that one is just a joke, because it only provides country stats, there are much better counters out there. The code for the counter must be pasted as first comment on the photopage. Note: Not in the description. Others try to hide their info gathering by regularly posting the previous uploaded photo together with the counter code as first comment.
This does only work for the photopage and your profile page. Other views, as the lightbox or the "all sizes" pages are not counted. Views via the lightbox are counted, actually. I think he meant you can't add a counter to the lightbox page. Yes, correct. Flickr itself does count views via the lightbox or "all sizes" - but third-party counters do not. In the light of this post: www. If one loads the photopage first and then enters the lightbox via "L"-key or clicking the "Lightbox"-magnifier symbol, then the view still counts as 1 because the lightbox is simply overlaid over the photopage.
You hint made me look at the source code of the lightbox - indeed it also contains the comments, but does not display them. Most counters only follow page elements that are displayed as the page loads.
Or send you a message saying they looked. Flickr staff have said often that they won't reveal the identity of signed-in viewers, for privacy reasons. And if the viewer isn't signed in, there's no way to know who they are. And if Flickr did reveal the identity of signed in viewers, many users would likely sign out while viewing photos.
Post Reply Preview. Bhaskar Dutta 10 years ago. Thanks Wil C. Does this mean that people who visit my photos while they arent signed in, the same also reflects in the number of visitors? It depends on how they're viewing them.
Any time a photopage is loaded in a web browser, it counts as a view of that photopage. If a set's page is loaded in a web browser, it counts as a view of that set. If the photostream page is loaded in a web browser, it counts as a view of the photostream. But if anyone signed in or not views your images some other way slideshow, third-party app, direct link to.
Those views do not count. HairyHippy 10 years ago. I also think that if you view a picture which is not yours, look at some others, then come back to the first picture the second and subsequent visit does not count.
I'm not sure how long it remembers you for the purpose of this. Fry Posted 10 years ago. Edited by Wil C. Fry member 10 years ago. That's true. EDIT: I just visited the newest image in your photostream several times. Each time counted as a view. Before posting that comment I tried it out on a random photopage.
I visited and revisited and even refreshed a few times and the counter stayed doggedly at 79 as I remember. How odd. Either Mr. Fry has superpowers, or I'm a second class citizen. I use Firefox browser. I'm flattered by the visits to my picture. I also just visited the newest image in your photostream several times and each time counted as a view.
0コメント