Therefore you should discuss the circumstances with them at the time they are affecting you. There is no obligation for staff to provide evidence for your claim. In most circumstances a health professional or University staff member can provide evidence to support your claim. However there are situations where evidence may come from other sources. If you are a victim of a crime you may request written evidence from the police supported by a crime reference number.
If you have suffered a bereavement you can supply a death certificate or a letter from an independent third party confirming the death, your relationship to the deceased and the impact on your ability to study. The University have provided this form which you may take with you to your appointment to help explain what information is required. The staff member may complete this form and you may include this as supporting evidence with your claim. Due to the limited information known about third parties, the University may not be able to contact people named in your claim to advise them that the University is holding data about them.
If you have read the policy and are still unsure, seek guidance from someone e. In exceptional circumstances, if you're prevented from attending an examination you may use self-certification if you are unable to provide any other form of evidence. If the premise is true, then the conclusion is also true. So, it is important to establish the truth of the premise; an untrue premise inevitably results in a false conclusion.
In this case the premise is true and so is the conclusion, which is that if you smoke you may get lung cancer. Induction Of the people I know who smoke many of them have lung cancer and therefore, if you smoke, you stand a good chance of getting lung cancer. Inductive arguments depend on the number of observations that support the conclusion. So, it is important to examine the strength of the observations. Abduction Scientific studies have established a high correlation between smoking and lung cancer.
Therefore, it is likely that smoking causes lung cancer. Abductive arguments depend on the degree to which the conclusion is supported by the evidence and data. The more evidence there is, the stronger the argument. Analogy Breathing toxic substances such as asbestos is known to cause lung cancer. Smoke from cigarettes is toxic and so is likely to cause lung cancer. The validity of this type of argument requires the key issues of what is being compared to be similar, and to be relevant and significant to the conclusion.
You need to show that what is known to be true about one issue is likely to be true for the other issue. Figure 5 Words relating to argument. Previous 1. Next 1. Print Print. Take your learning further Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University.
OpenLearn Search website Back to top. Our partners OpenLearn works with other organisations by providing free courses and resources that support our mission of opening up educational opportunities to more people in more places.
Find out more Support us. If you smoke you may get lung cancer. Of the people I know who smoke many of them have lung cancer and therefore, if you smoke, you stand a good chance of getting lung cancer. Scientific studies have established a high correlation between smoking and lung cancer. Decisions about how to treat illness and disease, optimize our health and wellness, and improve our society based on insufficient information.
Innovation stagnates. We spend money based on things that may not work … or worse. Technology has democratized investing, journalism, transportation, lodging and countless other industries. ProofPilot is removing barriers so that anyone with a valid question can run a study.
Why is Scientific Evidence Important?
0コメント